Articles Posted in Estate Planning

Last week the Wall Street Journal‘s “Family Values” blog discussed the often challenging estate planning issues faced by families who are providing for a disabled loved one. Our New York estate planning lawyers know that more families are in this situation than some might suspect. The latest U.S. Census data shows that roughly 12% of the population has a severe physical or mental disability. When planning for the future it is particularly important for these families to closely consider how they want to leave assets to their heirs because of the effect that the asset transfers may have on their disabled relative’s access to public assistance.

Budget shortfalls are causing many state and local governments to cut support services to these residents. A common cost-cutting measure includes tightening income restrictions for those seeking to qualify for medical benefits and support services. As a result, it is vital that all families structure inheritances for disabled heirs so that they are not disqualified from the government help that they will likely need. Yet, research shows that two-thirds of parents and caregivers with disabled loved ones do not have plans in place to account for the long-term needs of these vulnerable heirs.

This is particularly unfortunate, because there are planning strategies that exist specifically to assist families in this situation. For example, a special needs trust can be used to leave assets to heirs with disabilities while ensuring that they keep government benefits like Medicaid and Supplemental Security Income (SSI). Before this trust was available parents were often forced to disinherit their disabled children lest they lose all their government support. Now, those who create a special needs trust can leave assets for the child’s use beyond that which they will receive from the government. Families can set aside funds for clothing, education, entertainment, household goods, healthcare costs, and many other future wants and needs for their disabled relative.

There is often a default assumption that local parents wish to provide all of their children with equal shares of an inheritance as part of their New York estate plan. However, no two families are identical, and there are a variety of reasons why some parents feel it necessary to provide different assets to each of their children upon their death. The ability to tailor an inheritance using rules different than the default to suit a family’s specific desires is one of the main reasons why local families seek the assistance of New York estate planning lawyers. As one lawyer put it, “there’s nothing so unequal as the equal treatment of unequals.”

Most families take a variety of factors into account when deciding how to distribute their property. For example, one child may already be more financially successful, another may have a larger family of their own, and yet another may be estranged from the family. In other cases a parent may have already helped one child while alive–such as by providing down payment money on a house–and want that prior help to be reflected in the inheritance.

A Wall Street Journal story this weekend discussed how many families have questions about the best way to go about giving one child a larger share than another. Trusts are usually a more effective estate planning tool than a will. However, if a will is used, it is important that certain steps be taken to ensure that the uneven child distribution is capable of withstanding legal challenge. Part of that process involves being open and honest with family members about the inheritance so that children know about the terms while you are alive. This minimizes the surprise factor and may quell later suspicions. Having these conversations is often difficult, so as an alternative a video or instruction letter can be included with the estate planning documents to explain why a certain decision was made.

No matter what stage in life, all local residents have much to gain from conducting New York estate planning. However, proper financial preparation is particularly vital for those who have assets built up over a lifetime or who are nearing the age when long-term care planning is becoming more of a concern. One group which often faces unique planning needs are the recently widowed. As a New York Times article this weekend shared, these widows continue to be predominantly women and are often unfamiliar with issues like investing, taxes, insurance, and healthcare planning.

The article explains how one common problem faced by new widows is the myriad of individuals who may wish to take advantage of the situation. Many recently widowed have fallen victim to salespeople who make disingenuous promises while trying to sell investments, like annuities. Besides unscrupulous salespeople, some community members are also forced to deal with adult children who make requests that might not be in the individual’s best interest. For example, one advocate noted how some relatives may seek an advance on an inheritance by using arguments like, “How can you deny me this when we’re going through so much emotional pain already,” or “Dad would have given me the down payment money if he was still around.”

Dealing with these and similar demands can be particularly distressing for those already going through an incredibly difficult situation following the passing of a loved one. One advocate who now works as a counselor for the newly widowed explained that it is often best to let trusted financial assistants, like an estate planning attorney, help in those situations. She urges widows to “let that professional be the stingy one.” One of the main benefits of having professional guidance with these financial affairs is the aid that can be provided with complex inheritance issues and dealing with those who make demands on funds.

One of our New York estate planning attorneys, Bonnie Kraham, Esq., recently authored an article that shares information on the increasing use of trusts in the estate plan of many local middle class families. The story was published in this weekend’s Times Herald-Record, and explains the various types of trusts that residents can use and the way that each holds and transfers property. Unfortunately, there remains a misconception among some local community members that creating a New York trust is a project only for the wealthy. That is not the case. As attorney Kraham notes, there has been a “living trust revolution” over the past few decades where many middle class families have discovered the ways in which these legal entities can be used to avoid probate, save taxes, and protect assets.

All trusts begin with a written agreement, and each includes at least three necessary parties. These include a “grantor” who creates the trust, “trustee” who manages the assets, and “beneficiaries” who use the trust assets. For example, the three roles may be filled when a senior couple creates a trust (grantors) to be managed by their lawyer (trustee) to provide for the couple’s children (beneficiaries). The three roles need not be filled by different individuals, however. Often a grantor will also act as beneficiary, so that they can still use those assets while they are alive. Following the written agreement which establishes the trust, assets are transferred into the entity by way of “retitling.” This involves changing the name on accounts, mutual funds, and stock certificates to the name of the trust, and transferring title to property to the trust.

The two main types of trusts are testamentary and living. Testamentary trusts are created only after an individual’s death pursuant to their will, while living trusts are created while a grantor is still alive. Living trusts are an increasingly common way for many families to transfer assets at death. Among other benefits, a living trust can help families avoid probate, saving time and expense in closing the estate.

Last month we shared information on the unique estate planning issues related to the inheritance rights of children conceived posthumously. A growing number of community members are cryopreserving their gametes for use through in vitro fertilization. This is a particularly popular process for those diagnosed with cancer and undergoing chemotherapy and for those in the military who are leaving on a tour of duty. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that assisted reproductive technology accounts for only 1% of yearly births in the country. However, the overall use of the technology is rising dramatically. The total number of these births doubled in the last ten years, rising to 60,190 in 2009.

The expanding use of cryopreservation has presented novel legal questions about the rights of children conceived after the death of one of their parents. The inheritance rights of these children remain unclear, particularly as they relate to government benefits and trust participation. Several high-profile legal battles have ensued in the last few years as parents fought with the U.S. Social Security Administration to have their children receive their former partner’s benefits even though the child was conceived after the partner’s passing. The Social Security Administration usually defers to state rules regarding parentage and inheritance rights. Currently, most states only grant inheritance rights to children born after the death of a parent if they are conceived naturally.

Yesterday, Fox News reported on an appellate court decision in one of those cases where the court found that an 8-year-old girl born two years after her father’s death was not entitled to his Social Security benefits. This decision overruled a lower court ruling in the same case which had found otherwise. The appellate judges declared that the federal government’s interpretation of the state law was reasonable, and therefore the denial of benefits was upheld. The resolution in this case and several others like it lead many observers to believe that the United State Supreme Court will be forced to decide the matter soon.

Thousands of same sex New York couples have wed since the state became the sixth to legally allow such unions last month. At the time our New York estate planning attorneys noted how the change means that these couples are no longer required to pay state taxes on domestic partnership benefits, will gain access to worker’s compensation benefits, can bring wrongful death lawsuits on behalf of their spouse, and can file joint state tax returns. In addition, surviving same sex spouses are no longer subject to New York estate taxes on assets they receive from their partners at death.

However, the fight for equality continues. Same sex marriages are specifically repudiated at the federal level through the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). This has significant repercussions on the estate planning needs of married same sex couples. These couples cannot file joint tax returns or joint bankruptcy petitions. Upon the death of one spouse the other cannot inherit veterans benefits or Social Security benefits. Also, property passing to a surviving spouse is subject to federal estate taxes.

Our New York estate planning lawyers work with families on plans that account for both state and federal tax and asset transfer issues. We understand the complexities that same sex couples continue to face when preparing for the future as a result of the divergence in the law at the state and the federal levels. These inequalities led several area publications to issue joint appeals last week calling for DOMA to be declared unconstitutional. For example, the Syracuse Post-Standard noted that “the law discriminates by denying homosexual spouses significant federal benefits that flow automatically to heterosexual spouses.”

These tough economic times have placed many local residents in difficult financial situations. Many established families in our area may be considering ways to help out their less fortunate friends or family members who have faced recent financial bumps. However, there are often concerns about how tax issues will affect this generosity and whether or not certain giving will have consequences on inheritance plans. Whenever local families are considering large gifts it is helpful to consult with their New York estate planning attorney to understand how the law applies in their particular case.

Tax considerations are not the only thing that local families care about when considering helping out a friend or relative in need. However, there are various ways in which aid can be given, and it may be prudent to consider helping in one way instead of another based on tax issues. Unless the assistance is to one whom you are legally obligated to assist, such as a minor child, then the government will likely consider the gift in the same light that it would all others–including those intended to shrink an estate to protect it from other government taxes or benefit programs. These gifts will likely count against a lifetime gift exclusion amount, and therefore they may have consequences on a local family’s previous New York estate planning.

Forbes published a story this week explaining some options for families in this situation. For example, often the easiest way to avoid gift taxes is to give a value less than the annual federal exclusion amount of $13,000. Couples can combine this amount and may be able to give $26,000 to an adult child or other loved one in need without triggering tax consequences. Another alternative is to pay directly for the medical, dental, or tuition expenses of another. However, these payments must be made directly to the service providers, not to the individual whom the help is intended to benefit.

Our New York elder law estate planning attorneys are proud of our work as counselors at law, acting as trusted advisors for the clients who count on us. In this capacity we spend each day meeting with community members to understand their family dynamics and listening to their concerns and fears about the planning process. By familiarizing ourselves with the unique circumstances of each client we are able to anticipate possible challenges to their plan and ensure that all the bases are covered ahead of time. In this way we can use our knowledge and experience to help clients pass on their assets and protect those assets in a seamless manner that avoids legal challenges and court proceedings.

The use of trusts is one of the key ways that our New York estate plans help clients stay out of the courtroom. Unlike wills, trusts do not require court proceedings to settle, both in this state and in other states where property might be owned. Avoiding probate saves the time, stress, and high costs of the legal proceeding.

Besides avoiding probate, our New York estate planning attorneys work hard to craft plans that cannot be successfully challenged by those who may be upset by client decisions. This is where taking the time to understand the family dynamics of each client is essential. It is important to anticipate ahead of time individuals that might have hurt feelings because of the details of a plan or become disgruntled upon learning of a client’s decision regarding their assets. Unfortunately, family disagreements arise frequently in these situations, often leading some upset individuals to challenge the legality of the plan in an effort to overturn it.

The most recent survey from the Humane Society found that there are at least 78.2 million owned dogs and 86.4 million owned cats in the United States. The data indicated that nearly 40% of all American households own a dog while roughly 33% own cats. Pet ownership rates are near the highest ever reported. In addition, many owners go to unprecedented lengths to integrate their animals into their families, from including them in annual Christmas card photos to ensuring they have a spot in all family vacations.

Considering the close bond so many families have with their animal friends, it is only natural that they would want to provide for them in an estate plan. Our New York estate planning attorneys know that in our area pet trusts are no longer only for the rich, famous, or eccentric. Recent research has shown that somewhere between 12 and 27 percent of pet owners provide some provisions for their animals in their wills. Many families have visited our office and expressed a wish to take legal steps to ensure that their beloved pet will have the resources they need for as long as they need them in the future. In fact, we have set up a relationship with providers of these services at www.PetEstates.com to help clients gain the peace of mind of knowing that their animal will be protected after they are gone.

It is vital to have professional help with these matters, because haphazard planning could risk leaving your pet without any support. A recent Reuters article took a look at these common pet trust pitfalls. Many large, high-profile pet trusts have been severely curtailed by judges. Ensuring that the trust includes only a reasonable amount necessary to account for the animal’s well-being is important. Many problems can also be avoided if the trust names a caretaker who is willing to comply scrupulously with the terms of the trust. On top of that, if a trust names a final resting place for the pet it is important to check that the location will accept the animal. Most pets cannot be buried in mausoleums for humans in the United States.

Some local residents believe that they do not need to worry about creating a New York estate plan if they only want to divide all of their assets between their children equally. These community members are under the incorrect assumption that the default legal rules will ensure that everything works out as they wish. Unfortunately, this is rarely the case.

This weekend My SA News discussed this all-too-common mistake of voicing intent to be even-handed with asset distribution but not taking the proper legal steps to carry out that intent. For example, the story used the real example of a family with two parents and five daughters. Both parents had been married to one another their entire lives with no divorces. They did not conduct any estate planning because they always explained that they wanted everything to be divided equally among their children at their death. They did not even have wills drafted.

However, their actions did not reflect that voiced intention, and there was no plan in place to protect the family. For example, after the father died, the mother deeded the family home to the first sister. Later, a second sister deeded another house to the mother, but upon the mother’s death that sister wanted the home back. A third sister visited an attorney and asked for help. She wanted the family home and the second home to be divided equally among the children as the parents always wished.

Contact Information