Estate Planning

December 5, 2015

INHERITANCE RIGHTS OF POSTHUMOUSLY CONCEIVED CHILDREN

GROWING LEGAL ISSUE

The federal Department of Health and Human Services estimates that there are currently approximately 600,000 frozen embryos in the United States and the number continues to grow each year. Of these, it is estimated that approximately 60,000 could be implanted for full term pregnancy. In still other cases, a father or mother may freeze and store some sperm or eggs for future family planning purposes. In either event, a mother must have artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization or the embryo implanted. It is possible, even likely, that some of these embryos may be implanted and born after the passing of the father or mother with the use of a surrogate mother. The legal rights of these posthumously conceived children are still being fleshed out in legislatures and courtrooms throughout the country. In 2012, the United State Supreme Court dealt with rights of a posthumously conceived child to the Social Security survivor’s benefits of the deceased parent in Astrue v. Capato.

FEDERAL AND NEW YORK LAW

December 2, 2015

ESTATE TAX CARRYOVER FOR SURVIVING SPOUSE

by Ettinger Law Firm

PORTABILITY

In 2011 Congress revamped the estate and gift tax laws and legislated that the federal estate and gift tax exclusion amount was $5 million. This amount is annually adjusted for inflation; the 2015 maximum is $5.43 million. Any estate values less than this amount are excluded from estate and gift tax liability. So, for example, if a husband passes away and leaves $4 million to his wife, the wife has an additional $1.43 million that she carried over to her own estate, as well as the standard $5 million that she is entitled to for her own estate if she also passed away in 2015 before any federal estate tax liability is incurred. Consequently, under the simple example provided, the wife is entitled to $6.86 million in exemptions before incurring any federal estate tax liability. If the surviving spouse remarries, he/she still retains the right to the portability of the unused estate tax. The portability is only effected if the second spouse of the surviving spouse also pre-deceases the original surviving spouse then the portability from the first spouse is extinguished. The idea and principles of estate tax portability do not apply to generation skipping transfer taxes, which is when a grandparent leaves money to his or her grandchildren.

IRS ALLOWS A DO OVER

November 30, 2015

QUALIFIED TERMINABLE INTEREST PROPERTY TRUST

by Ettinger Law Firm

QTIP TRUSTS – WHAT IS IT?

In our society, with divorces as common as it is, many people would likely benefit from a qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) trust. The QTIP trust gives a stream of income produced from a trust to a surviving spouse. That money passes without payment of any estate tax, as the spouse enjoys the unlimited marital deduction for estate taxes. The surviving spouse does not obtain title to the income producing property or control over it. The QTIP trust documents control where it goes after the surviving spouse passes away. It allows for the interim benefit of the surviving spouse, while preserving the income producing property. After the surviving spouse passes, the property goes to the heirs as designated by the QTIP trust.

ELEMENTS OF A QTIP TRUST

November 19, 2015

WHAT DOES THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR HAVE TO DO WITH MY RETIREMENT?

by Ettinger Law Firm

PROPOSED RULE FOR INVESTMENT PROFESSIONALS

On April 20, 2015 the Department of Labor officially published a proposed rule change in the federal register. To put the matter in dollars and cents is approximately $17 billion dollars per year, according to one estimate by the White House council of economic advisors. The proposed plan seems simple enough, but whenever $17 billion dollars is at stake, many voices on both sides of the debate will weigh in and drown out that which seems simple. To add urgency to the matter, over 10,000 people per day are slated to retire over the next 15 years. Most particularly, the rule would require that retirement advisers give investors advice that is in the client’s best interest. The rule itself is called the “conflict of interest” proposed rule. Another name for the client’s best interest is the “fiduciary rule”. Registered-Investment advisors are already held to the higher standard, while brokers-dealers are held to a lower, “suitability” standard.

CRITICS

November 16, 2015

WHEN YOUR ATTORNEY IS A POTENTIAL WITNESS IN SURROGATE COURT

by Ettinger Law Firm

WITNESS ADVOCATE RULE

In New York, as well as perhaps every other jurisdiction, an attorney may not serve as an attorney as well as a witness in the same case. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.7 is mandatory and not permissive. It does not matter if it is a bench trial, jury trial, traffic court case or surrogate’s court case. In fact, the rule is so important to judicial administration that even partners and members of the same firm cannot act as a witnesses. Courts refer to the issue as the lawyer-witness rule and it comes up often enough in surrogate court cases. The June 2, 2015 case of Will of Lublin, 2015 NY Slip Op 31038(U) is a good example of how estate lawyers face these issues. While the lawyer in Lublin avoided the issue of Rule 3.7, a small change could have made it not so. Very briefly, the decedent, Mr. Irving Lublin, executed a will in 1997 and passed away in 2010. Someone objected, claiming that the decedent did not have sufficient mental capacity to create such a will, the will was not properly executed and that the will was the result of fraud and undue influence. The lawyer who drafted the will was deposed during the discovery phase. If, perhaps, the attorney who created the will also represented the executor, an entirely plausible and even relatively normal scenario, the attorney would be disqualified, as he/she would be a material witness.

UNIQUE POSITION IN THE CASE

November 14, 2015

FINE ART, ANTIQUES AND OTHER COLLECTIBLES IN ESTATE PLANNING

by Ettinger Law Firm

SELL NOW OR PASS ON

The issue of how to deal with the collection of fine art that you amassed over the years should be dealt with now rather than allowing your heirs decide for you. Perhaps your heirs do not have any appreciation for your original Ansel Adams or Edward Curtis photo collections. If you view it as an investment, then timing your sale to maximize profit should be the most important criteria. Timing may not be right for several years or it may be right now. If you are looking to maximize profit which will only go to to your estate, you may consider waiting to pass it on. If, you happen to value your art collection because of its intrinsic artistic value, you have another set of criteria by which to make your decision. Perhaps you have a family member you know would appreciate it more than say your son or daughter. Perhaps you should sell it to insure that the artistic value continues to be appreciated. Country Living spotlighted an artistic marble collector who decided to sell his collection to insure that it would continue to be appreciated. In any event, Capital gains tax on collectibles, gift tax and estate tax, both state and federal, must all be considered.

ESTATE TAX

November 6, 2015

LACKING IN MENTAL CAPACITY AND FAMILY, WHO DECIDES

by Ettinger Law Firm

On June 24, 2015 a trial Court in California invalidated a California law as unconstitutional, which created a default surrogate decision maker when that individual is mentally incapacitated and does not have a family member, or anyone else for that matter, to make key decisions for them. The law and the issues addressed are not limited to California. Even though by definition, the law deals with individuals with no proxy decision maker, that does not mean someone did not exist in the past or could not step up to become one. Proxy decision makers pass away themselves, they move or simply just fade away and no longer attend to their responsibilities. New York law deals with these issues in a rather collaborative way. In 2010, New York enacted the New York Family Health Care Decisions Act, which creates a decision ladder for medical professionals who need to know with whom to check with for certain critical decisions. It was designed to avoid the parade of horribles that the California law dealt with. Certainly, no one wants a loved one or relative, even a distant relative, to have to rely on these provisions; they are used as a last resort.

DETERMINATION OF INCAPACITY

In the absence of a health care proxy, The New York Family Health Care Decisions Act begins to shape decisions, for all intents and purposes, at the time of the determination of incapacity.

November 3, 2015

WHAT OF MY ESTATE PLANNING IF MOVE TO ANOTHER JURISDICTION?

by Ettinger Law Firm

Say you live here in New York and made significant plans to avoid probate. You have a will, own a business that you pass on and even set aside significant assets for your grandchildren. You worked hard to put your financial house in order. Now you find out that you have to move to another jurisdiction for work and will likely be there for some time. More likely than not your will and other plans to avoid probate will survive as legally enforceable documents in the new jurisdiction. Nevertheless, you worked hard for your plans to be finalized and do not want to live with the idea that “more likely than not” your plans will be followed. As such, it is always best to check with a local estate planning and review your plans.

FACTORS TO CONSIDER

There are a few things to keep in mind when it comes to decisions on where to live and changes in law and nuances on how to handle the change. Most laws are relatively uniform throughout the country. Procedure may be different but substantive laws are similar in many cases. Except when they are not. Some issues have two different ways of handling things. A good example is common law states versus community property states. Community property states are generally Rocky Mountain states and west (Louisiana and Wisconsin are the exceptions). There are some important differences in their approach to passing on assets between the two camps. Another factor to address is that you need to clarify your residence or domicile or you may end up paying taxes in two different states, as what happened to the heir to the Campbell’s soup fortune in 1939.

October 31, 2015

CAN AN HEIR BORROW AGAINST INHERITANCE?

by Ettinger Law Firm

Perhaps your prodigal child wants to start a law firm or a medical practice and needs start up funding. You have some money set aside for your children’s and grandchildren’s inheritance but agree to loan them the money out of this fund. It’s not uncommon for these monies to be secured by a promissory note, even though many parents would not strictly enforce its terms. If the promissory note is not paid off by the time the parents pass away, it becomes an asset of the estate that must be accounted for. If it is a significant amount of money, the IRS or state tax authority will impute interest. If the parent decides to forgive the loan, that is usually considered taxable income to the child.

LOAN DOCUMENTS AND ESTATE DOCUMENTS CONTROL

The parent controls these issues and to the extent that it can be controlled during his or her life, they should be. Loans should be in writing, with the repayment schedule outlined. Most loans obtained on the open market have extensive outlines of the remedies that the creditor reserves. These are not necessary unless the parent actually intends to exercise these remedies. If no remedies are outlined in the document, the parent always has the right to document his or her intentions on how the estate should treat these loans.

October 29, 2015

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN ESTATE PLANNING

by Ettinger Law Firm

Intellectual property is an umbrella term that includes several different specific areas of the law. Trademark law, patent law, copyright laws and trade secret laws are all examples of intellectual property laws. The constitution guarantees that the federal government has exclusive jurisdiction over patent and copyright laws. Patent and copyright laws are designed to “promote the progress of science and useful arts.”

COPYRIGHTS, OWNERSHIP, HEIRS AND ESTATE PLANNING

Copyrights created after 1978 are generally good for the life of the author plus 70 years. When written for a corporation, so called work for hire copyrights, the copyright is valid for 95 after first publication date to 120 years after the work is created. To pass a copyright on to heirs, you must be careful to do it the right way. If a painter passes a painting on to an heir the right to control the copyright of that painting does not necessarily follow. The painter will have only passed on the original painting. To pass a copyright, the trust, will or other document must specifically mention that the copyright to the painting passes to the heir. It is entirely possible for a painter to pass the original work to a friend or partner but pass the copyright on to another person.