Wills

August 16, 2011

New York Estate Planning Can Address Religious Goals

Proper estate planning involves respecting client wishes about distribution of assets while creating legal documents to avoid probate, save estate taxes, and plan for disability. Many plans include similar components, but there is flexibility so that each client’s unique goals and preferences are accommodated. For example, many area community members work hard to adhere to their religious principles in all areas of their lives–including their New York estate plan.

A new article posted at Wealth Journal recently explained how few areas of the law are as entangled with religious issues as estate planning. Many components of an estate plan may be influenced by one’s religious or spiritual beliefs, from traditional rules about asset distribution to statements about medical decisions and funeral arrangements. For example, traditions like Judaism, Islam and Orthodox Christianity have detailed rules of inheritance that some may wish to follow as closely as possible. Similarly, it may be important to leave detailed instructions for trustees on how funds should be dispersed in accordance with those religious traditions and values.

Most residents usually apply a hybrid approach to blending their religious belief with their estate plan. One many wish to avoid following any religious custom except for burial and funeral arrangements. Others may seek strict adherence except restrictions on cessation of heroic medical measures. There is seemingly an endless combination of approaches that one might seek to balance in their estate plan. Of course, whatever one’s desires it is crucial to have open and honest discussions with loved ones about these issues so that they can be communicated effectively during the planning process. In our area it is also important to contact an experienced New York estate planning attorney who can effectively integrate religious wishes into a plan that simultaneously respects legal, tax, and ethical issues.

August 2, 2011

Estate Planning is Not Just for Senior Couples

by Ettinger Law Firm

Some area residents may think that New York estate planning is only for married seniors who have big families and substantial wealth. Fortunately, more and more people are coming to understand that this planning is a necessity for all community members, no matter what their situation in life. The Calgary Herald recently discussed the universal applicability of estate planning by sharing the example of a thirty-six year old mother of two who was recently divorced. The woman had never before seriously considered financial matters, but everything changed following separation from her husband.

It was not long before the mother began to realize that taking care of her family was now squarely on her shoulders–necessitating prudent preparation for long-term contingencies. For example, if she were to suddenly become ill, who would take care of her children? If she became disabled, how would the family survive? The woman began considering these and similar questions before realizing that she wanted the peace of mind of knowing that she had prepared for these possibilities ahead of time. The woman visited an estate planning attorney and learned what options were available to her. She eventually purchased life insurance, disability insurance, and had legal documents drafted to ensure others could make critical decisions on behalf of her family if the need arose.

The mother’s situation is a good example of why estate planning is often particularly important for singles. Those without a partner frequently need to clearly spell out their wishes ahead of time, because fewer people may be around to speak on their behalf. For example, a thirty year old single man may get in an accident shortly before closing on his first piece of real estate. If he has taken the time to create a durable Power of Attorney, the named individual may be able to close on that new home on his behalf. There are countless similar situations that may arise where prior estate preparation can significantly affect an individual’s life.

June 2, 2011

$100 Million Estate Finally Reaches Relatives After 92 Years

by Ettinger Law Firm

An important benefit of visiting with a New York estate planning lawyer to help with your asset planning is that on top of carrying out your wishes, the professional can share avenues available to you of which you may not be aware. For example, many area residents are under the impression that their will is nothing more than a document that specifically divvies up assets. In reality wills can be crafted in virtually unlimited ways depending on specific family dynamics and the ethical values of the testator.

Perhaps no high-profile case better illustrates the complexity with which a will can be drafted than the story of Wellington R. Burt. At one point one of the richest men in America, Mr. Burt made his wealth in the robber baron age and was primarily involved in the lumber industry. Mr. Burt lived to age 87, passing away in his Michigan mansion in 1919 with an estimated net worth around $60 million.

The lumber giant gained notoriety following his death as the details of his will were revealed. Mr. Burt was particularly careful to ensure that his living relatives received only a small part of his fortune. To avenge an apparent family feud, Mr. Burt left his children relatively small annual payments from $1,000 to $5,000–except for one favored son who received $30,000 yearly. The rest of the man’s estate was held in trust until 21 years after the death of his last direct descendant alive at the time of his death.

ABC News reported recently that that final requirement was met in 2010–92 years after Mr. Burt’s passing. Mr. Burt’s last grandchild died in 1989, triggering the 21 year wait which finally expired in 2010. Last month the twelve descendants of the lumber tycoon reached an agreement to split up the estate now valued over $100 million. Based on seniority, the individuals received values ranging from $16 million to $2.5 million.

While a “spite clause” is perhaps not advisable for many area families, the case of Wellington Burt stands as an evidence of the immense flexibility that exists to all those considering what to do with their assets following death.
Continue reading

May 31, 2011

Lack of a Will Leads to Controversy in Estate of NFL Legend Gene Upshaw

by Ettinger Law Firm

New York estate planning is often given little thought by some local residents until a specific event brings attention to the issue. A retirement, death of a close friend or relative, and similar occurrences often act as a catalyst leading residents to consider plans for their own affairs. Unfortunately, for many residents that triggering event never occurs, and they end up waiting too long to properly prepare matters related to their estate. It is in those cases that controversy and disagreement often leads to fighting among surviving relatives.

That appears to be what happened with the estate of NFL football great and union leader Gene Upshaw. Earlier this month The Washington Post reported on the saga surrounding Mr. Upshaw’s death, lack of will, and controversy among his friends and family in the aftermath of his death. The 63-year old Upshaw was vacationing with his wife in 2008 when he unexpectedly fell ill. He was taken to a local hospital and died three days later.

Mr. Upshaw did not have a will or any other estate planning matters settled before his sudden illness. As a result, there was a chaotic, questionable attempt to have a will drafted and signed in the three days between his illness and ultimate death. According to reports the last-minute document appeared to leave all of the man’s assets to his wife, naming her as trustee and executor. However, many questions remained about Mr. Upshaw’s mental state at the time the will was drafted and whether or not he actually signed the document.

A few months after his death, Mr. Upshaw’s eldest son filed suit disputing the will. He claimed that his father was essentially unconscious in his final days and unable to execute the paperwork. His mother-in-law, however, asserted that he was conscious and capable of speaking. It was later revealed that Mr. Upshaw had not in fact signed the document but that his friend had done it on his behalf. Both sides entered into a prolonged dispute. The matter was set to go to trial earlier this month but was finally settled privately a few days before the start.
Continue reading

January 27, 2011

1585 Points of Contact

by Ettinger Law Firm

by Michael Ettinger, Esq.

We were thinking the other day about what typically happens when a client signs a will. After the will signing, the client often fails to ever look at the will again and the lawyer may never contact the client again either.

Now, let’s say this particular client dies thirty years later. The old will is trotted out and, lo and behold, the executor is some very elderly or deceased sibling and the beneficiaries are quite different from what the deceased would have wanted thirty years later. Not to mention that by only having a will, not being a plan for disability or nursing home protection, this client may have died penniless, having spent down all of their assets to pay for long term care.

October 25, 2010

The Race to the Courthouse

by Ettinger Law Firm

We received a call last Friday from a woman who said that her father had died but her stepmother was claiming that he did not have a will. The daughter was certain that he did, in fact, have a will.

What happens in such a case? Regardless what the daughter believes, unless a will can be produced there is no will. A check of the county probate court would be in order as some clients traditionally filed their wills in court for safekeeping, but this is rarely done today. There is also the possibility that the father destroyed the will he had, for whatever reason.

Another possibility is that all of the assets may have been made joint with the father’s second wife and that she was also named beneficiary of any other assets, such as IRA’s, annuities and insurance policies. In this case, all of the assets pass to the surviving spouse without any court proceeding and there is no need for a will or, if there is a will, there is no need to file it.

September 8, 2010

What is Elder Law Estate Planning?

by Ettinger Law Firm

by Michael Ettinger, Esq.

“Elder Law Estate Planning” is a niche area of the law which combines the features of elder law and estate planning that pertain most to the needs of the middle class.

Estate planning was originally for the wealthy few. Middle class families did not consider themselves as having “estates” to plan. During the Reagan years (1980-1988), a great economic expansion occurred, raising the asset level of the middle class into the realm of estate planning. With middle class people suddenly exposed to “estate taxes”, the need arose for estate planning, to reduce or eliminate those taxes. A few years later, in 1991, the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) published “A Consumer Report on Probate” which concluded that probate was a process to be avoided, in all but the most exceptional cases. This marked the beginning of the end of traditional will planning and started the “living trust revolution”. AARP recommended that families start using trusts rather than wills, to avoid probate and save their beneficiaries tens of thousands of dollars in the estate settlement process.

May 13, 2010

Pitfalls of Will Planning

by Ettinger Law Firm

By Michael Ettinger, Esq.

So many clients are advised that they need a will. In fact, will planning is becoming obsolete for persons over sixty for many reasons.

Instead of actually solving problems, wills often create them. First, they must be proven to be valid in a court proceeding, the infamous probate, for estates in New York over $30,000.00. Court proceedings can be expensive, time-consuming and things often go wrong. Also, when the client dies, that will is usually out-of-date, having been created decades before. The executors may be the wrong persons, the beneficiaries or their percentages may be wrong or other changes in the family have not been taken into account.

April 12, 2010

Using Living Trusts to Delay Distribution Until Children Mature

by Ettinger Law Firm

By Michael Ettinger, Attorney at Law

.

Historically, estate planning consisted of setting up a will and leaving everything to one’s children in equal shares, “per stirpes”. The “per stirpes” is latin for “by the roots”, meaning that if any of the children predecease their parents then their share goes to their children, if any.

March 19, 2010

Same Sex Couples and The GLBT Community

by Ettinger Law Firm

by Michael Ettinger, Esq.

Same sex couples face unique estate planning issues since, in many jurisdictions, their unions are not legally protected. New York, for example, does not permit same sex marriages although the state does recognize same sex marriages performed elsewhere (i.e., Massachusetts, Connecticut, Vermont, Iowa and D.C.).

Living trusts are often the estate planning vehicle of choice for the GLBT community for a number of reasons.